Humm. I cannot reproduce this anymore. Will report if that changes.

behdad
http://behdad.org/


On Sun, Jul 30, 2023 at 12:41 PM Behdad Esfahbod <beh...@behdad.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In benchmarking FreeType face loading, I noticed that the following two
> loops take considerable time when loading CFF1 face:
>
>
> --- a/src/cff/cffobjs.c
> +++ b/src/cff/cffobjs.c
> @@ -695,8 +695,8 @@
>
>
>            FT_TRACE4(( "  %5d ", idx + 390 ));
> -          for ( l = 0; l < s1len; l++ )
> -            FT_TRACE4(( "%c", s1[l] ));
> +          //for ( l = 0; l < s1len; l++ )
> +            //FT_TRACE4(( "%c", s1[l] ));
>            FT_TRACE4(( "\n" ));
>          }
>
> @@ -710,8 +710,8 @@
>
>
>            FT_TRACE4(( "  %5d ", cff->num_strings + 390 ));
> -          for ( l = 0; l < s1len; l++ )
> -            FT_TRACE4(( "%c", s1[l] ));
> +          //for ( l = 0; l < s1len; l++ )
> +            //FT_TRACE4(( "%c", s1[l] ));
>            FT_TRACE4(( "\n" ));
>          }
>        }
>
>
> I don't have tracing enabled, but the compiler doesn't seem to have wiped
> away the loop. I'm not sure why. At any rate, I wonder if these can be
> guarded by FT_DEBUG_TRACE or some other way to remove the overhead?
>
>
> behdad
> http://behdad.org/
>

Reply via email to