> On Jan 22, 2024, at 12:45, Hin-Tak Leung <ht...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> 
> FWIW, this seems to duplicate functionality in harfbuzz, and also a mere 
> subset, for that matter?

On the other hand, the dysfunctional kerning API, which exists, is misleading. 
Partial GPOS support to fulfill the API promise is not a bad idea. The line 
could be drawn exactly there at the existing API.

I agree that the scope of the change should be clearly defined.

Reply via email to