On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:19:02 +0300 Nikolay Mikhailov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Do you mean flags in FT_FaceRec (e.g. style_flags)? >> They are used to "indicate" the font properties, >> not to give orders for synthesization to FreeType. > >Can I ask... Bold (font-weight) can be 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, >700, 800 or 900. But style_flags can be FT_STYLE_FLAG_BOLD or normal. Yes. I think, FT_STYLE_FLAG is intended to be style flag of MacOS QuickDraw (and Windows GDI?), which has no parameter to tune embolding strength. As we can find a button of embolding but no slider to tune the embolding strength on most cheap office suite applications, I guess there are wide requirement of artificial embolding and slanting, but requirement of tuning them is not wide. >How can I get face with other weight? I'm afraid there's no widely-applicable algorithm to embold glyphs. Do you have any proposal? Usually, "embolding" is done by overlapping of glyphs with slightly shifted origins. Such embolding can easily reduces complexed CJK glyphs into black square. In CJKV book by Ken Lunde, it is explained that there is fundamental difference of graphical data between XXX-Light and XXX-Heavy CJK glyphs. Regards, mpsuzuki _______________________________________________ Freetype mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
