> No, I haven't. The code used comes from
> http://freetype.sourceforge.net/freetype2/docs/reference/ft2-glyph_management.html#FT_Glyph_To_Bitmap
> which I assume is a reasonable example to use.
OK.
> I'm not sure of the difference between the two codes. It appears to
> me that example1.c uses direct structure dereferencing whereas the
> reference docs example uses function calls to extract the values.
Well, this is a matter of taste.
> Maybe the example1.c way is smarter from a speed perspective but I'm
> concerned since there seemed to be work happening in FT_Get_Glyph
> and FT_Glyph_To_Bitmap. I really like to know why the example code
> is better than the reference code, because I'm not finding it
> obvious.
It's not `better', it's just working.
Anyway, since you can reproduce the problem with ftview it seems that
it is really a FreeType issue. Please send me the font privately for
further investigation.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
