It is better. It, however, feels like all spacings increased. Do you still use left-side-bearing and right-side-bearing? Are they updated as a result of these glyph translations? They should be, right?
On 1/26/07, David Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, please try the current CVS, I've made some improvements to advance width computations. However, there is an inherent conflict between ideal spacing and reducing the blurness. Frankly, I don't know if this new light hinting algorithm will be in the next release; if too many complain about it, I'll move it to a new hinting mode (hurray for more options, and all the associated changes to the rest of the graphics stack !!) Hope this helps, - David Turner - The FreeType Project (www.freetype.org) On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:14:25 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > Before it's too late, I would like to complain that spacing between > the glyphs has become much worse in recent CVS. See the attached > snaps. > > - "po" "pe" now touch each other > - "ra" much closer now > - "op" too far > > The snapshots are Verdana. > In DejaVu-Sans even stems have uneven widths. Bluriness hides a lot of > imprefections. > Oh well.
-- Alexei A. Podtelezhnikov, PhD _______________________________________________ Freetype mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
