Ok, I think I've got it...
If the glyph is "small" enough it will use the sbit cache and it is not
rerendered. That is very fast (~100times faster).
But I wonder why the glyph size limit was set to 48px in the example?
Kind regards,
Ulrich
Ulrich wrote:
Hi,
I've looked into freetype's caching subsystem. As far as I understand
it does not cache bitmaps of rendered glyphs. Am I correct? I come to
this opinion because I've also read a bit in "ftcommon.c" from the
"ft2demos" and it looks like if a glyph is always rerendered (lines
870ff). So I have to implement bitmap-caching myself?
_______________________________________________
Freetype mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
