> In general, how stable is the latest CVS head compared to 2.3.7?
> Should I stick the using 2.3.7, or should I wait for 2.3.8?

I'll release 2.3.8 in a few days.

> I saw a few such additional cases, including cases where an internal
> C file directly includes <stdlib.h> when it probably shouldn't:
> 
> raster/ftmisc.h (includes stdlib)
> psaux/t1decode.c  (lines 357, 780)
> base/ftlcdfil.c
> autofit/afhints.c

I think I've fixed all those issues in the CVS; please test.


    Werner


_______________________________________________
Freetype mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype

Reply via email to