>> We don't have those macros defined:
>>
>> BUILD_FREETYPE2_DLL
>> FREETYPE2_STATIC
>> USE_FREETYPE2_DLL
>> USE_FREETYPE2_STATIC
>>
>> It seems to me that this is an attempt to provide some of the
>> `configure' stuff in a different way. I basically don't object to
>> it, but right now those macros are black box values, so I consider
>> it best if they are part of the package which defines them.
>
> Do you mean that you would agree if, in addition, the patch adds
> those definitions in configure.ac (for mingw / cygwin) and in the
> visual studios files?
Yes. Note that I can't maintain the latter since I don't use them.
Ideally, they are created automatically -- it has been mentioned that
`cmake' can do this, but I don't have time (and honestly, not
sufficient interest) to add support for it.
Werner
_______________________________________________
Freetype mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
