Hi all, I'm wondering if there's a typo in the FT_Pos docs, at: http://freetype.sourceforge.net/freetype2/docs/reference/ft2-basic_types.html#FT_Pos
It's described as a *32-bit* integer, but is typedef'd to be a *long*. On LP64 systems (Like x64 Linux), a long is actually *64* bits - See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LP64#Specific_data_models If it's really required to be 32-bit (ie: int32_t), I suspect problems would have been reported before this. As such, I suspect it's just a typo in the docs (Which should probably be fixed ;) ). Ian _______________________________________________ Freetype mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
