Hello, 2-a would be appreciated for me, too. the add-on isn't urgent for me at the moment, so that is no problem for me when the changes will be integrated after next official release. Regards, Andreas Dear Werner,
Yesterday I got a comment from Andreas Heinrich (the original reporter of this issue), he preferred 2), especially 2-b). Still I feel small hesitate to modify FT_Library object without a comment from Turner, so I will commit 2-a) for first (within 36 hours, I hope), and commit 2-b) after next official release, freetype-2.3.12. I want to avoid a pity that new function is introduced in 2.3.12 and removed in 2.3.13. On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 06:51:19 +0100 (CET) Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> 2-b) Add the switch to FT_Library handle, to hide the default >> parameters in the font handle creation. It can change the >> behaviour of popular APIs like FT_New_Face() taking no >> optional parameters. > >> The default parameters can be changed by >> FT_SetDefaultNewFaceParam_FreeType(). > >Can you find a better, shorter function name? Something like >`FT_Set_Open_Args_Defaults'... Thank you for reasonable comment. For future compatibility, generic name would be better. In fact, after writing the patch proposing 2-b), I found another case that I want to hold something in FT_Library. I will post another discussion about it. It is not for 2.3.12 release. Regards, mpsuzuki _______________________________________________ Freetype mailing list Freetype@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype To: w...@gnu.org Cc: da...@freetype.org freetype@nongnu.org To: mpsuz...@hiroshima-u.ac.jp w...@gnu.org Cc: da...@freetype.org freetype@nongnu.org
_______________________________________________ Freetype mailing list Freetype@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
