In message <[email protected]> [email protected] wrote: > Thank you for the explanation of the historical background of > 3-operands syntax (that I called as "omitted" syntax). Hmm, so, if > I used 4-operands syntax in the assembly code, it cannot be > assembled by THUMB instruction, and the codesize would be worse... > Should I insert some ifdef to enable original 3-operands syntax for > the platform with THUMB?
Your code won't assemble in THUMB mode anyway, as some of the operations aren't expressable in the THUMB instruction set. So just change that instruction and don't worry :) Robin -- Robin Watts, Email: <mailto:[email protected]> Warm Silence Software, WWW: <http://www.wss.co.uk/> P.O.Box 28, Woodstock, Tel: 01608 737172 (or Mobile: 07885 487642) Oxfordshire, OX20 1XX Fax: 01608 737172 _______________________________________________ Freetype mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
