On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote: > It's a bug in the interpreter, as far as I can see. I think it > wrongly sets the phantom points for composite glyphs. This glyph is > the first time ever I've seen an alignment on a vertical phantom > point; this might be the reason that the problem hasn't been > discovered earlier.
Another clue: the ttx file lists an hmtx table but no vmtx table... _______________________________________________ Freetype mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
