On Tue, 10 Mar 2015 11:16:06 +0100 (CET), Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> One potentially misleading thing, I think, is the routine name >> “FT_Bitmap_New”: it does not allocate any storage at all (contrast >> “FT_Outline_New” and “FT_Stroker_New”), but initializes the Bitmap >> structure to indicate “zero width, zero height, no pixels”. A better >> name might have been “FT_Bitmap_Init”, or even “FT_Bitmap_Null” or >> “FT_Bitmap_Empty”. > > Renamed in git to `FT_Bitmap_Init'.
Cool! Presumably you provide a #define of the old name for backward compatibility. :) what about FT_Get_X11_Font_Format <http://freetype.org/freetype2/docs/reference/ft2-font_formats.html>? Is it time to rename that to, say, FT_Get_Font_Format? _______________________________________________ Freetype mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
