On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 05:48:44 +0100 (CET) Werner LEMBERG <[email protected]> wrote:
> And if you have really found a bug, it is a > great aid to me for debugging and thus very efficient also – only a > failing snippet can *exactly* demonstrate the issue. No, I don't think I found some bugs. My questions are about FreeType use. As long as the documentation describes only the less efficient way of FreeType use, I have no other choice than trying myself and asking questions. Ah, BTW, I have a library architecture observation/note: The structures FTC_ScalerRec and FTC_ImageType are in practice the same structure, described in some different way. Then why not to join them (add a field .flags to FTC_ScalerRec)? The same applies for the pairs of functions FTC_ImageCache_Lookup/FTC_ImageCache_LookupScaler and FTC_SBitCache_Lookup/FTC_SBitCache_LookupScaler. One of the pair is actually redundant. And last: In the documentation, I read that "We hope to also provide a kerning cache in the near future." Is these plans still alive? Best Regards. -- http://fresh.flatassembler.net http://asm32.info John Found <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Freetype mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
