I see. Then, please try env CFLAGS="-arch x86_64" ./configure then execute make.
I don't have the latest Mac OS X, so I'm not sure whether "./configure && make" generates 64bit binaries by default on your platform (note: you've not told the version of your platform :-)). In my understanding, FreeType2 configure has no special rule to prioritize 32bit than 64bit for Mac OS X, so I guess you can for FreeType2 as you do for other libraries as far as "./configure && make" style. Regards, mpsuzuki Rodrigo Cano wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for replying. I build by doing "./configure && make". I'm honestly > not too familiar with this build process. I'm using a 64-bit mac. Do you > mean to say that I should be getting a 64-bit binary? Any chance that a > universal library is being created instead? > > -Rod > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 8:44 PM, suzuki toshiya <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Do you say as: when you follow the standard way like >> "./configure && make", you get 64bit binaries in the >> case of other libraries, but, you get 32bit binaries >> in the case of FreeType? >> >> Regards, >> mpsuzuki >> >> Rodrigo Cano wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Another application I'm using requires that I have free type built as a >>> 64bit dylib for mac. Following the standard way of configuring then >>> building its creating either a 32bit library or possibly a universal >>> library. Is there any easy way to direct make to build a 64bit library? >>> >>> Thanks for your time. >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Freetype mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype > _______________________________________________ Freetype mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
