> I am an algorithm engineer in image processing. Here I have > some question to ask you (maybe about the history of these > algorithm )
I am not a freetype developer but I have been following font rendering issues for a while. > research the panel sub pixel arrangement and sub pixel > rendering for oled screen. Good, let's hope we get them soon. > 1. what does mac or apple system using for "font display". > Is that the “truetype”？ Truetype is not a font display system, it is a font format with many complicated aspects. Roughly all font display systems have several components, like: * A font format that given a character code allows a font rasterizer to generate a glyph made of pixels. There are several different font formats, the most popular are TrueType, PostScript Type 1, and OpenType. * A font rasterizer like FreeType that produces a pixel raster from some font file and a character code. There are many different font rasterizer implementations. * A text renderer that takes a string of character codes and layout instructions, and using a font rasterizer and font files creates a pixmap with the glyphs for the character codes rendered in it according to the layout instructions. There are very many text renderer implementations. The whole complicated stack of concepts is briefly summarized here: http://www.sabi.co.uk/Notes/linuxFonts.html#importantConcepts > 2. ClearType using 3 channel to calculate the rendering > font. I can't understand it. I also see the freetype code > doing like this. Rasterizing a glyph often is done by first rasterizing to a bitmap and then scaling doing to a graylevel or color pixmap using some kind of filter, sometimes preserving even subpixel positioning, not just rendering. Sometimes that can be done in a single pass. The biggest problem as you know for color pixemap rasterization is fringing. There are many online and printed articles on how glyph rasterization is done. Almost all techniques are patented, but many patents have expired. Some links about terminology and examples: * General introduction with several interesting links: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subpixel_rendering#See_also * Another nice illustrated introduction: https://www.grc.com/ctwhat.htm * "A Treatise on Font Rasterisation With an Emphasis on Free Software" https://freddie.witherden.org/pages/font-rasterisation/ * "The Raster Tragedy at Low-Resolution Revisited" http://www.beatstamm.com/Typography/ * Random subpixel rendering patent: https://www.google.ie/patents/US6384839 > 3. Because the ClearType only do the horizontal so some > Vertical Shape may have sawtooth？ There are many reason： > 1. horizontal have three subpixel; > 2. human visual system are sensitive to the horzontal direction. AFAIK that's 1), simply because that is the way LCD screens are subpixeled. Why did LCD engineer decide to subpixel them horizontally? I don't know. _______________________________________________ Freetype mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
