On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 08:30 +0100, Duncan Webb wrote: > The tracker at python.org looks good and this is > http://roundup.sourceforge.net/
I'll take a look, thanks. I agree bugzilla is messy, but it can be slimmed down, and it has the benefit that it's quite common in the opensource world, so many people who submit bugs are familiar with it. > But you know that I prefer trac as a tracker. It integrate so well with > subversion. A while ago I set up a test installation to see if it is I'm under the impression that for subversion integration it needs to run on the same server as the subversion repository? Or does it just need a local checkout? The check-in viewer looks nice though. > worth using and I think it is. I like the milestones and timeline and > the tracker looks not bad. If you have time take and have a play ;-) What I don't like about trac is how it looks like it tries to takeover the project website. How well can it be integrated? It might not be as bad if it was obviously a separate site from the main freevo.org site. Maybe branded as "Freevo Development Center" or something. There seems to be no way to jump to a specific ticket number? I see you've got the 1.x wiki contents in there. Does trac use the same formatting or is there an import tool? Jason. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
