On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 09:24:20AM +0800, Wan Tat Chee wrote: > Well, the spec files and patches in my contrib dir goes all the way back > to 1.2.x. > If no one objects, I'll remove everything except the current freevo*spec > files.
Since we don't exactly want to encourage people to use those versions, it would probably be a good thing to get rid of them. > I rebuild runapp and freevo_xwin when I generate the RPM package (via > make). I'm not sure if it should be static or shared since it's rebuilt? A > quick inspection of the file sizes seem to indicate that freevo_xwin is > shared, while runapp is static for the latest CVS snapshot. (Currently I'm > using RH 7.3 as my build machine. May change to RH 9 in the future). The dynamic runapp is around 10k, static is 300k, even stripped, so it might be prudent to keep it dynamic for known distributions. The runtime will probably have the static one. Aubin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
