On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 11:08:53AM -0300, Rob Shortt wrote: > Hmm, I think that 4 version numbers is a bit much (1.3.1.1). I would > much rather see us increment versions more often, like release 1.3.2 > asap and have the next release either 1.3.3-rc1 (and no more than 1 or 2 > rc's MAX) and move to 1.3.4 or 1.4.0 quickly.
I'm not exactly partial to 4 version numbers, I just think we spend so much time in "pre" releases that people will always be running really old versions that are difficult to support. I can't count the number of times I've said "It's fixed in preX or in CVS" and I can't fault a user for wanting the stable release. > major_version.minor_version.patch_level is a pretty good way to go and > you are right, we are making significant changes so perhaps we should > bump up the minor version more often. I definitely link everything post 1.3.2 is a big change, but I think 1.4 should wait for your record_server... Aubin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers & Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php _______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
