On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 12:02:54AM -0300, James Oakley wrote: > There's no guarantee of the order of those elements, especially in other > grabbers when they start using this convention. Ed Avis said that people > writing applications should use the one with the single number as the channel > and the other one for a readable name. You *could* use .isdigit() and > .isalnum() instead but there are some systems which have some channels with > letters in them.
How does a channel with letters in it work? Agh. So there is no way to be sure then? This could be annoying. I just want a way to map out tuner id numbers, channel ids and human-readable channel names. The stuff I have so far seems to work, but it looks like I'll need to keep an eye out for other XML examples. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Parasoft Error proof Web apps, automate testing & more. Download & eval WebKing and get a free book. www.parasoft.com/bulletproofapps _______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel