On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 16:07, Hans Meine wrote: > Alan Cox' state machine comment applies here ;-) > But state machines are admittedly not the way to program IMHO. Auto-generated > state machines for parsers are OK, but elsewhere you don't want to have code > that implements branching state machines with more than say 5 states. ;-/ Yeap, and key word here is auto-generated, it needs a describing language, and after generation they are not human readable.
> OTOH this 5-childs-in-a-row thingy is a bordercase. One _can_ split that code > up into different functions (each setting the next as callback) and at least > have them be sequentially in the source file. ;-) 1. Not so border line as i wish, cd_burn plugin right now has one of these :) and not only five, as many as the tracks you want to burn to CD 2. hmmm .. five functions (even if sequential in source file ;) ) against one function with a for a in bla Bruno ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
