Hi, Jason Tackaberry said the following on 06/13/2005 10:15 PM: > On Mon, 2005-06-13 at 19:31 +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: > >>Maybe pyimlib2 is the way to go. Let's think about it. You also have > > Maybe it is.
Maybe we just stop thinking and just do it. The only problem with this name is that there is a Display class that is not "really" part of a python wrapper for imlib2. So what? If you want to display something with imlib2 you need X and you need something like the Display class. I think everyone can life with it if there is one simple class in a library/package that he does not need. So my new suggestion is: Let pyimlib2 be as it now and give the first release the codename "Salvator Dali" or "The endless discussion about Display" crunchy -- Everybody lies, but it doesn't matter since nobody listens.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
