Jason Tackaberry wrote: > On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 11:14 +0100, Karl Lattimer wrote: >> I'd like to hear what dirk has to say about the state of skins in 2.0, >> and given some time over the next two evenings I may just have some cool >> layouts and some nice eye candy to keep you tempted. > > I can't speak to the skin subsystem, but I can say that the underlying > canvas architecture will have no technical limitations that I can think > of (except for possibly CPU limitations). Whatever you can imagine in > terms of design and layout, or even how video itself interacts with the > application, the canvas should be able to do. It will be possible to > put video on the canvas, so if you want an interface that has a small > thumbnail view of the video (even translucent if you like) in the corner > while you're navigating the menus, and when you're done and want to view > the video, it can slide and zoom and fade back in as it goes to full > screen, the canvas will make all this possible. > > Now I don't know if the skin system will. I think if you have a > specific need for some feature, dischi or someone else could probably > add it, but I don't want to speak for him. :)
Yes. Right now the skin supports no animation at all and the animation code in Freevo itself only support fade in/out and move objects. I guess we need to rewrite the skin code once you finished canvas, I integrated it and Karl wrote his ideas we need to put in fxd style. Dischi -- My opinion is neither copyrighted nor trademarked, and it's price competitive. If you like, I'll trade for one of yours.
pgp2iWNbidj35.pgp
Description: PGP signature
