And that's exactly why I chose to go the route I did.
There's nothing wrong with anamorphic skins in general. I think that
creating an anamorphic skin is double work; i.e. do the scripting _and_
edit your pictures to show up correctly. Why do more work than
necessary? Programming can be tough enough as it is. Why add the
extra burden of graphics work as well? Do the script and use whatever
images you like; that's _my_ philosophy.
--- Christian Lyra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I´m running a freevo at 1366x768 as this is the native resolution of
> my 32" LCD Tv. I found, as you have before, that panorama skin
> skrew up the images.
>
> >
> > There's a reason why I branched from the project to write my own
> > plugins and adapt Freevo for a more specific hardware set: the
> > defaults as they are don't fit well enough for me. I'm trying to
> > contribute back since the real grunt-work programming is done by
> > folks more talented than myself. If anyone wants to see my
> configs,
> > plugins or other edits, please, contact me.
____________________________________________________________________________________Ready
for the edge of your seat?
Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Freevo-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
