Dirk Meyer wrote: > Jason Tackaberry wrote: >> On 2007-10-25 08:55, Hans Meine wrote: >>> I also prefer kwargs. However, I wondered about your double (()), and >>> I agree >>> with Jason that a single timer per object simplifies things. >> >> I dislike the differentiation between, as in Duncan's example, min and >> mins kwarg. I'm never going to remember what's what. >> >> The idea was mins allows an interval, whereas min was a fixed time. An >> interval is just a shorthand way of specifying a list of possible values >> for min. So how about we just let the kwargs accept sequences or range >> objects. >> >> t.schedule(min = 0) # on the hour every hour >> t.schedule(min = range(0, 60, 50)) # every 5 minutes >> t.schedule(hour = [0, 12], min = 30) # at half past midnight and noon >> >> Calling it AtTimer would be fine with me. > > Look right to me. So we agreed on the interface and the name. Anyone > coding it? ;)
First draft is in SVN, feel free to improve Dischi -- How can something be 'new and improved'? If it's new what was it improving on?
pgp3BYADlfElj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
