On 2008-01-09 10:03, Dirk Meyer wrote: > Yes, they do, I do not disagree. But is it bad to keep the notifier > namespace, too? Right now we can call BOTH kaa.Timer and > kaa.notifier.Timer. Why is it allowed to call kaa.main.step and not > kaa.notifier.step?
See below. > So you propose no "notifier" in external code, right? Right. :) I'm not fond of the term, and I think the only reason we're using it is because underneath we're using pynotifier, which I see as an internal implementation detail that needn't be revealed through API names. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
