Jason Tackaberry wrote: > On 2008-01-16 13:13, Dirk Meyer wrote: >> If we rename Signal.connect to Signal.hook we have a lot of code to >> change. And connect seems fine to me. > > Hans was referring to the exception_handler member of InProgress, since > I mentioned I didn't like the term 'handler' here. He suggested 'hook'. > > I actually think just 'exception' is fine.
exception is not possible. We have three things: a callback called
when InProgress is done (finished), when done with exception
(exception) and a signal for the exception. You can't name the signal
the same name as the callback. Since we use [weak_]connect to connect
to the result, maybe hide the internal exception signal and use
[weak_]exeception_connect or [weak_]connect_exception.
Dischi
--
/* After several hours of tedious analysis, the following hash
* function won. Do not mess with it... -DaveM
*/
2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/fs/buffer.c
pgpaXkGqOfkq2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Freevo-devel mailing list Freevo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-devel
