Quoting James Oakley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > - From what I can tell from the man page, -af resample will always > resample. > - -srate will leave a 48kHz stream alone. > > However, neither option should have any affect on an AC3 stream as long > as you > use the '-ac hwac3,' option, which will pass the stream unaltered to the > spdif output. That's what you were having trouble with, right? No, I mostly use freevo for music. Zero interst in recording television (though that'd be 32khz if i used the btaudio driver, and entirely allowed under IEC958), even less interest in using it as a dvd player. I have a handfull of divx recordings with ac3 audio, but it's a small handfull. > > I'm not saying the quality was unacceptable. I'm saying i am > > intellectually and aesthetically irritated by the concept. > > Resampling a stream to 48kHz is very trivial in software. Picking the > closest IEC958 rate and resampling to that in hardware isn't nearly as > trivial.Why make it complicated? Most of the content I'm interested in playing is 44.1khz, and a small amount is 48khz. I'd be quite surprised if any of it was anything else. Why not just play the audio at it's original sample rate? Running it through the wringer yet again is something i find distasteful, even if you want to claim that eight out of ten people can't tell the difference. > Put a CD in your DVD player and play it. What does your amp say? "PCM 44.1 Khz" Thanks for helping me clear that one up. ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 _______________________________________________ Freevo-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
