"Andrew Jergens" wrote: > You guys might not know this, but most Television, NOT MONITOR, > manufacturers stand by the little bit of scaling on their 768 screens. I > know the spec is 720p, but when I was at CEDIA (big integrated theater trade > show in Indianapolis, IN), all the manufacturers were standing by their 768 > screens as the way things are going to be for now on. I didn't have time > really get into the details, but they all assured us that 768 was the way to > go for a 720p signal.
I know. IIRC they use 768 height because they reuse some monitor production stuff for the panels. And they don't care about the scaling. I also had a discussion with a man at a shop how wanted to tell me that 768 is better because it has more pixels and that 720p looks better on 768 than on 720. But I talked with a guy from Thomson some time ago and he knows the problem, but they don't care because it is cheaper and most people don't see the difference. And hey, everyone is doing it, so the user has no choice. :( > Additionally, I have yet to find a person who can actually see, and point > out, the artifacts created by the little bit of scaling. Now, keep in mind, > we're not looking at bargain basement displays, but rather the top of the > lines. Maybe I don't see it, maybe I do. But scaling is always bad. What I wrote before. I play a video and the pc scales it to one resolution and the tv scales again. That can't be good. > Don't kill the messenger, I can't, I don't know where you are :) Dischi -- Reality is for people who lack imagination.
pgpefjlrOotGM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Freevo-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freevo-users
