On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 10:07:44PM +0000, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] dixit: > > >i.e. grouping config options from different places in a `choice' like > >manner, forcing selection of (at least) one of them, the definition of > ^^^^^^^^ > This should read "at most", not "at least", of course.
Yes, in terms of conflicting packages. So combined it probably should be "selection of exactly one" ;) > But that then breaks the as-module options. How about someone wants > to build one into the image and one as module? > > I still don't see the correct approach, even when not looking at the > implementation. The situation you mentioned is not covered by mconfig. Even with optional tristate choices, selecting "yes" is done exclusively. > My suggestion would just be a preselected list copying as .config... Why not implementing a little more intelligent solution making heavy use of `sed'? `cp' means overwriting the user's config each time. Moving .config to .config.old is maybe also an alternative. The plus in using `sed' is that only little effort is needed to make the package collections easily extensible, or at least more simple than editing .config by hand. Greetings, Phil _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
