Lothar Gesslein dixit: >I just know enough happy users and am one myself. It is used for whole >projects and distributions. It is nothing new or hightech, i'd rate it >quite mature and well-known. I think it "just works (TM)".
This is probably the experience of most people, but once you have spent hours trying to look for bugs in code which turned out to be bugs in gcc… >If it does not work as expected, it just fails to build. This sentence is easily proven wrong. (Hint: Try rtorrent with -fomit-frame-pointer for once. Or joe-editor, although that one broke for only search'n'replace for me, and even that only for a few files.) >Yeah this is the way i've been doing it now. It's just so much places >where the quotes are missing ... even with the "legal" ones substracted, >and finding theese legals is quite hard for me. I am however happy you're still at it. >I found the buildroot quite complex, and non-self-explaining Yes, even nbd admits that, but he said what they had before sucked even more. >blame my lack of experience and >knowlendge. Actually, no. You're trying, that is what counts. None of us understands all implications of this build system. If I had a few months paid, I'd rewrite the packaging system, including host tools (and toolchain). We'd have to add kernel and image stuff on top of that later. But that'd be a really major task, even though I already have plans for some aspects. bye, //mirabile -- I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them. If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny existence. -- Coywolf Qi Hunt _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
