Hi, On Tue, 07 Nov 2006 at 9:19 +0100, Christian Fischer wrote: > On Monday 06 November 2006 21:49, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: > [...] > > > I've done some ifupdown hook script changes and additions. > > > Please tell me what you think about it and whether it makes sense to do > > > additional work on it or not. > > > > Yeah, sure. > [...] > > Sorry, for the late response. I would like to see a clean patch for > > trunk, so that we can try it out. > > > > bye > > Waldemar > > Hi Waldemar, > > thanks for your response, I really thought that you think this is a kind > of "humbug" ;-) > > The whole thing is in beta state and has some bugs. I must review the code, > then I'll send you the source. > > As first I've tried to get it working without any ifupdown patches, no way on > some points. > I've implemented some workarounds for missing patches, the idea was that the > patches aren't mandantory. > > The result is that i work at least around the workarounds. I prefer a clean > straight forward code. > > What do you think about ifupdown patches to enhance the hook script > environment to get a clean solution?
Depends on the size and complexity of the patches and if you could feed them upstream. I care about maintainence, every external patch make maintainance more complex. Looking forward to see some of the code. bye Waldemar -- don't open your wrt, free it http://www.freewrt.org _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
