On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 03:37:29PM +0100, Phil Sutter wrote: > Hi Dirk! > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 02:40:57PM +0100, Dirk Nehring wrote: > > > 2. Why revert r976? > > > 3. Those collection specific defaults are part of the new style for > > > defining Package Collections, i.e. on a "free willingly" and "default > > > if not set" base. So if you really want to revert it, you also have to > > > put the selects back into Config.in.collections. > > > > But this doesn't work with existing .config files or if you change your > > preselection after saving. For this, forcing some core packages are > > better in my eyes. > > Well, in my idea of Package Collections they are useful for people > setting up everything for the first time and not being absolutely sure > what to choose. The only alternative is forcing a selection of those > packages contained in a collection, so you will be actually forced to > use dnsmasq (or at least have it installed, irrespective of it being > used or not). > I actually did change the way Package Collections work because wbx and > me agreed on it being the better one.
With the known problem mentioned above. > Recapitulating I would suggest to discuss this further, as it's > absolutely not clear which way to go. Especially as we are still > searching for alternative methods of getting a set of packages selected > easily (maybe also without `conf'). > [...] > > > 4. Indeed, I did intentionally remove those "default m if devel" > > > statements, on wbx's behalf. So better consult him for that (if you > > > didn't already do so). > > > > Sorry, was in the old patch. > > Sorry, didn't get this one. What was in the old patch? Which old patch? > Waah, sounds like "train station". I want to say: cd trunk/freewrt svn diff -r r976:975 (apply the diff to current) Dirk _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
