Hi,
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 at 8:42 +0100, Dirk Nehring wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 09:30:02PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Author: wbx
> > Date: 2007-01-07 21:30:01 +0100 (Sun, 07 Jan 2007)
> > New Revision: 1520
> >
> > Added:
> > branches/common-adk/freewrt/package/libcli/patches/patch-Makefile
> > Removed:
> >
> > branches/common-adk/freewrt/package/libcli/patches/01-remove_debug_honor_prefix.patch
> > Modified:
> > branches/common-adk/freewrt/package/libcli/Makefile
> > Log:
> > update to new style, update to latest upstream
>
> As I mentioned before, the *BSD style of managing patches are not very
> informative here: you delete a description ("remove_debug_honor_prefix")
> I favour for the automatic patch system (here, this case is really
> simple, indeed). Nobody will know the meaning of this patch tomorrow,
> only by analysing it. It that what you and Thorsten really want?
>
> Please, consider thinking about it!
Please look into the patch. It is trivial, no need to have a long
description. I save a lot of time using the update-patches method.
We will never have a solution, where all are happy. For trivial
patches there is no need for long descriptions. They are only needed
to get the stuff cross-compiled. One simple cat and you know why the
patch is there.
bye
Waldemar
_______________________________________________
freewrt-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
