Hi,
On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 at 16:26 +0100, Ralph Passgang wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 4. Februar 2007 13:29 schrieb Waldemar Brodkorb:
> > Hi,
>
> [...]
>
> > Can you update the nano package in 1.0, too. I like to have packages
> > working in both versions.
>
> that was my plan for this evening/night. I will update the 1.0 branch with
> the
> following things:
>
> - upgrade bind (security update)
> - upgrade nano (fixes a annoying segfault bug in 1.0)
> - upgrade rsync to 2.6.9 (keeps freewrt fresh)
> - add shorewall (waiting for an answer of austriancoder)
> - add scsi-spin (only if I get a positive response)
>
> I asked austraincoder on friday, if he is thinks the shorewall package is in
> a
> good shape for 1.0. If he doesn't answer till this evening, I will do this
> even without his agreement. I just wanted to be nice this time and ask him
> BEFORE.
>
> For scsi-spin it's the same. I am waiting for an answer if this package
> actually can spin down disks that are attached via usb. But in contrast to
> shorewall, I will not upload it to 1.0 until I recieve any response.
>
> I am upgrading rsync to 2.6.9 in trunk right now. I will also add this to the
> 1.0 branch, if rsync 2.6.9 works well.
>
> do you agree with all this?
Yes I agree. I like to finish 1.0.2 next week. On my todo is
* trafshow (customer requirement)
* fixes for mini_httpd/freeradius/chilli if neeeded (customer requirement)
* asterisk 1.2 update (sync with trunk, fixes speex, remove codecs
which will never work fine on non-fpu systems, like ilbc10
* aircrack-ng and small madwifi-patch (requested by michael some
time ago, for his perfect netgear wlan sniffing machine)
Have fun
Waldemar
--
don't open your wrt, free it
http://www.freewrt.org
_______________________________________________
freewrt-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
