Hi,
On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 at 19:40 +0100, Ralph Passgang wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 7. Februar 2007 19:10 schrieb Waldemar Brodkorb:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 07 Feb 2007 at 17:25 +0100, Ralph Passgang wrote:
> > > I am now finally happy with the state of shorewall (as long as no bug
> > > will be discovered) and will not touch the trunk version anymore. You
> > > told me privately, that you want to include the latest release candidate
> > > in trunk, so please go ahead. :)
> >
> > Only in special cases we should use release candidates or cvs/svn
> > checkouts. You can always add new features via patches and remove
> > them as soon as upstream has a release.
> >
> > But why the hell is shorewall package so important, we have more
> > then 300 ppackages. Can you take care of other packages as
> > well in the same intensive way? :p
>
> I updated bind, rsync and nano last week (altogether this fixes a security
> issue as well as a dirty segfault bug and rsync 2.6.9 should also be better
> (and more stable) then 2.6.8) and trying to understand why my new package
> scsi-spin fails (maybe really the kernel patch is missing) at the moment. As
> you know I do quite a lot other things too, so I cannot upgrade 30 packages a
> week and that every week. In this week, for example, there will be definitly
> less time for contributing to freewrt than last week. That will change from
> week to week.
Sorry to not make it clear, I do not mean you, I mean austriancoder
Oopsie. I should always directly flame personally.
So sorry that you get it wrong.
Keep going, see ya tomorrow morning :}
Waldemar
--
don't open your wrt, free it
http://www.freewrt.org
_______________________________________________
freewrt-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
