On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 10:43:27AM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote:
> Hi,
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 at  9:48 +0200, Dirk Nehring wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 05:52:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Author: wbx
> > > Date: 2007-03-26 17:52:25 +0200 (Mon, 26 Mar 2007)
> > > New Revision: 2275
> > >
> > > Modified:
> > >    trunk/freewrt/package/busybox/Config.in
> > > Log:
> > > enable mknod, needed for postinst scripts for  misdn
> > >
> > > Modified: trunk/freewrt/package/busybox/Config.in
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- trunk/freewrt/package/busybox/Config.in       2007-03-26 07:14:21 UTC 
> > > (rev 2274)
> > > +++ trunk/freewrt/package/busybox/Config.in       2007-03-26 15:52:25 UTC 
> > > (rev 2275)
> > > @@ -1233,7 +1233,7 @@
> > >
> > >  config BUSYBOX_CONFIG_MKNOD
> > >   bool "mknod"
> > > - default n
> > > + default y
> >
> > Perhaps a dependency is better?
>
> Is it so big? I have very often the problem, that I need mknod for
> drivers, which do not work with mdev/devfs.
>
> May be I need to understand devfs/mdev to create new static device
> nodes with a config snippet.

Not worth to discuss: 430 bytes compressed.

Dirk
_______________________________________________
freewrt-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers

Reply via email to