Zitat von Dirk Nehring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 09:20:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Author: tha > [...] >> - converted four manual patches to the freewrt patch format > > Hi,
Hi Dirk, > as we all know the FreeWRT patch style is technically better for > updates, but loosing important information about the patch itself. We > had the discussion earlier (for Asterisk), perhaps you look into the > argument we changed there. Even if the documentation is not so much > (like autocreate_none or multicall_binary), it has the advantage of > grouping patches, and compatibility to other OS projects. Now all > patches are tattered. I understand your point. Indeed there are some advantages as well as some disadvantages with the freewrt patch format. If you are willing to change the madwifi patches to the classical patch format that was used before my last commit, and if you are willing & able to apply the security patches that are needed in 0.9.2.1, then feel free to change that again. I can mail you the security patch if you need them. If you are not willing to do this, then we will keep the patches as they are in svn right now for the upcoming freewrt 1.0.4 release. Does this sound fair? :) So feel free to commit these changes in 1.0. > Dirk --Ralph _______________________________________________ freewrt-developers mailing list [email protected] https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-developers
