Hi Waldemar, || On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 03:01:29 +0100 || Waldemar Brodkorb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
wb> Asterisk in FreeWRT 1.0 is in bad state, we did not change wb> anything since the fork of OpenWrt. In our development tree we wb> are working on packages for the latest asterisk versions 1.4.0 wb> and 1.2.14. As soon as 1.2.14 is working and tested, I will wb> integrate it to 1.0.x. That sounds good. Any timescale on that? I am now considering to try the FreeWRT development version myself. Is this something you would advise against due to some known problem? wb> Are you sure speex is not to slow for 266 Mhz MIPS CPU? I honestly have no idea, but wanted to give it a try. wb> I am unsure if we better should make a ADK option for this and wb> only activate it, if a user choose asterisk-speex codec to his wb> image. Yeah, maybe that is a good idea. Regards, Georg -- Georg C. F. Greve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Free Software Foundation Europe (http://fsfeurope.org) Join the Fellowship and protect your freedom! (http://www.fsfe.org) What everyone should know about DRM (http://DRM.info)
pgpxuIXEVkfsd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ freewrt-users mailing list freewrt-users@freewrt.org https://www.freewrt.org/lists/listinfo/freewrt-users
