Water
prices to agriculture are amazingly low. I pulled a number off an
Alabama
website (complaining that subsidized water in the west is killing AL
ag): $5-15 /acre foot for agriculture, $200-$600/acre foot
for municipalities. There are 326,000 gallons in an acre-foot of water, so
1 thousand gallons costs $0.015 to $0.03 for farmers, while it costs $0.60 to
$1.80 for city folk. The cost of meat would then have to carry only four
to twelve cents per pound at 2500 gallons/pound. Even at low end city
prices, it would only add $1.50/pound. Meat producers may be covering the
twelve cents.
It also suggests that water is
incredibly cheap. The high end municipal price is around the current cost
of desalination, roughly $2/thousand gallons. If we started to pay the
real, unsubsidized cost of water, and allowed people to sell their water rights,
we might find we have plenty of water.
-Mike
Oliker
Message:
1
Date: Wed, 16
Aug 2006 18:31:39 -0400
From: "Martin
C. Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re:
[FRIAM] My biggest complaint about ethanol as
automobile
fuel
To: The Friday
Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
Message-ID:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Bill Eldridge
wrote:
>
> Sorry to
switch subjects, but from Steve Boyan:
>
>
I was wrong. If I had known that for every pound of beef I did
not
>
eat, I would save anywhere from 2,500 to 5,000 gallons of water,
I
>
would have been moved.
Why doesn't a
pound of beef cost more than 2500 gallons of water?
Wouldn't ADM
(or whoever cares for the cow) have to pay for that much water? To make a
profit, wouldn't they have to charge more than their
costs?
Confused,
Martin
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
