|
Nope. More interested in how the intentionality damps out. Gravity
may turn out to have been a good idea after all... Was wondering about the hand, though. Sometimes it's there, sometimes it's not, but we always assume that it is there, setting things in motion, and that it's the same hand. :-) Phil Henshaw wrote: hmm... very good laugh! But sounds like you're interested in the limitless growth of our making ever bigger mistakes. Is that possible?Phil Henshaw ¸¸¸¸.·´ ¯ `·.¸¸¸¸ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 680 Ft. Washington Ave NY NY 10040 tel: 212-795-4844 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] explorations: www.synapse9.com-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Carl Tollander Sent: Sunday, September 10, 2006 10:03 PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: Re: [FRIAM] incredible machine - Google Video Whatever happened to sensitive dependence on initial conditions? Are there outtakes? bloopers? chaotic-so-sorry-about-your-city-effects? Owen Densmore wrote:OK, Rube Goldberg, step aside! http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3163263343187879320 -- Owen Owen Densmore http://backspaces.net ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org |
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
