Of course, there is always the threat that sombody will fall in love with either the prototype or (worse) the prototyping environment and then proceed to misuse the prototyping tool, typically by pushing it beyond it's capabilities. Living inside an IDE often feels like that.
--
Doug Roberts, RTI International
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
505-455-7333 - Office
505-670-8195 - Cell
On 9/11/06, Raymond Parks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Douglas Roberts wrote:
> An equally reasonable alternative suggestion: write every app as an APL
> one-liner (no indentation nor whitespace needed).
And it can be write-only (no reading and modifying). Which, of
course, is why we keep trying things like WinFX - so that there's some
chance that you can pick up the code I generated two years ago and
change it. I'm just a cynic, but sometimes I think we spend more time
and effort writing code to be reusable and modifiable than if we just
rewrote it every time we needed to change it.
--
Ray Parks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IDART Project Lead Voice:505-844-4024
IORTA Department Mobile:505-238-9359
http://www.sandia.gov/scada Fax:505-844-9641
http://www.sandia.gov/idart Pager:800-690-5288
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
