But what do you mean by 'it'. Does the subject referred to a thing or a projection of rules and information?, and if you can't tell the difference, why wouldn't that be one of the interesting aspects of whatever 'it' is and worth mentioning?
Phil Henshaw ¸¸¸¸.·´ ¯ `·.¸¸¸¸ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 680 Ft. Washington Ave NY NY 10040 tel: 212-795-4844 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] explorations: www.synapse9.com <http://www.synapse9.com/> -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Douglas Roberts Sent: Sunday, July 01, 2007 5:16 PM To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group Subject: [FRIAM] Too much later,and we wouldn't be able to know that there's a universe at all Hey, If you guys want something really complex to wax philosophical about, try this: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070629-the-universe-will-destroy- the-evidence-of-its-origin.html <http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070629-the-universe-will-destroy -the-evidence-of-its-origin.html> Exerpt: [...] there's another layer of complexity on top of that, namely that we only recognize that there is an anthropic principle because we came along at the right time. -- Doug Roberts, RTI International [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 505-455-7333 - Office 505-670-8195 - Cell
============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
