Well, the problem with the management solution for natural resource sharing is 
there's no one in charge, and actually no position from which anyone could be.  
So beyond learning creative ways for independent users to share, the only 
option to avoid unexpected eruptions of conflict would be to have a way of 
seeing the line of conflict coming.  People seem unaware that there are good 
long range indicators in the complexity of negotiations for watching that...

Phil. 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: "Marcus G. Daniels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:54:51 
To:The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]>
Cc:"'Diegert, Carl F'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] can you have 4 operating systems on one buss?


Phil Henshaw wrote:
> That's sort of a central control mechanism for dealing with independent
> users that were not smart enough to share the limited resource on their own.
> If the independent users were to learn enough about each other's needs they
> might learn ways to cooperate and make better use of the limited shared
> resource.
It's not that they are not smart enough to figure out what the resource 
is and how to share it.   It's that in this case the real failure would 
be ongoing haphazard negotiation by users, which is clumsy and poorly 
informed and its realization is usually not the primary problem they are 
interested in solving.  Better to design an automated load balancing 
algorithm and leave that work to a fast and patient computer.   The 
identification of general principles of what constitutes fair use (e.g. 
equal access to memory and cycles and known turnaround time), is the 
social/organizational question, and it's separate from the implementation.

So my question in response to yours, in the context of the subject 
line,  was:  "Is there really a resource under contention?"
Or is it just a venue for someone to interleave themselves as a 
controller and make themselves more important than they ought to be.  
Lots of people have vested interests in existing inefficiencies, the 
management of conflict, and the facilitation of people who would rather 
not think.

Marcus


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to