"The entire "global" universe is about 10E100 times as large as the universe 
we can see.": Rich Murray 2008.06.12

Our single universe bubble in the few most recent of 14 billions of years 
has accelerating expansion.

Now, in recent human research, a hint that its unobserved vastness may have 
different fundamental properties.

We are audacious germs indeed, surfing our exponential scientific expansion 
boldly into this vastness -- since 1600 AD, 408 years and counting.

Our bubble's geometry, according to membrane theory, has 10 space dimensions 
and 1 time dimension.

This hints that the source of our big bang must have as much or higher 
dimensionality.

There's never just one of anything.

There must be more big bangs from our big bang source, very many more, 
plausibly infinitely more, each with at least one dimension of time.

What kind of awareness and intelligence might evolve in a bubble with 2 or 
more time dimensions?

Each bubble develops black holes and other extreme regions, including 
deliberate laboratory experiments, that may initiate more big band 
universes.

Our big bang source most probably still exists, undisturbed by the 
initiation of our big bang bubble.

The acceleration of our big bang bubble hints that it is overall a transient 
event on the scale of thousands of billions of years.

Our big bang bubble exists in its own right, regardless of our thoughts and 
actions, as does our big bang source so exist in its own right.

I say as a mighty microbe that single unity sustains every variety of 
infinity, and that "individual" awareness is single unity -- not part of it, 
but all of it, already, always, all ways, directly, intimately, 
creatively -- so that "each individual" awareness is equally the very 
foremost point of progress of single unity.

Our Home is the abyss of single unity.

In mutual service,  Rich Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED]  505-501-2298

'The structures stretch beyond the edge of the observable universe, which is 
essentially confined to a region with a radius of 14 billion light years, 
since only light from within that distance has had time to reach us since 
the big bang.

The entire "global" universe is about 10E100 times as large as the universe 
we can see." [ 10E33 larger radius ]

http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn14098-hints-of-structure-beyond-the-visible-universe.html

Hints of structure beyond the visible universe

    * 01:01 10 June 2008
    * NewScientist.com news service
    * David Shiga

Subtle signs of a skewed universe are present in the WMAP satellite's map of 
radiation left over from the big bang, a new study says (Image: NASA/WMAP 
Science Team)

    * Inflation deflated? The big bang's toughest test
    * 06 June 2008
    * Did pre-big bang universe leave its mark on the sky?
    * 10 April 2008
    * Universe mostly forgets its past during cosmic rebirth
    * 02 July 2007

Web Links
    * WMAP, NASA
    * Planck satellite, ESA
    * Introduction to inflation, NASA

Colossal structures larger than the visible universe -- forged during the 
period of cosmic inflation nearly 14 billion years ago -- may be responsible 
for a strange pattern seen in the big bang's afterglow, says a team of 
cosmologists. If confirmed, the structures could provide precious 
information about the universe's earliest moments.

In the first instant after its birth, the universe is thought to have 
experienced a rapid growth spurt called inflation. During this period, space 
itself expanded faster than the speed of light.

Inflation solves some cosmological puzzles, such as why relic radiation from 
the big bang, released when the universe was less than 400,000 years old, is 
relatively uniform.

Called the cosmic microwave background (CMB), the radiation can be observed 
in all directions in the sky. It has a slightly mottled appearance due to 
small differences in temperature from place to place in the early universe. 
The temperature differences are thought to be caused by variations in the 
density of matter, with denser regions being warmer than emptier regions.

But the theory of inflation predicts that the mottling should be equally 
prominent in all directions. Curiously, it is 10% more pronounced on one 
side of the sky than the other, an asymmetry that was reported in 2004 by 
Hans Eriksen of the University of Oslo in Norway, based on a map made by the 
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) satellite.

Now, cosmologists led by Adrienne Erickcek of Caltech in Pasadena, US, think 
they may have found the reason for this pattern. They suggest the universe 
has been skewed by the imprint of primordial structures that date back to 
the period of inflation.

Extra field

The structures stretch beyond the edge of the observable universe, which is 
essentially confined to a region with a radius of 14 billion light years, 
since only light from within that distance has had time to reach us since 
the big bang.

The entire "global" universe is about 10E100 times as large as the universe 
we can see.

In the inflation scenario, the expansion is driven by an energy field of 
still-mysterious origin. Erickcek and her colleagues argue that the 
asymmetry could be the remnant of fluctuations in an additional energy 
field, which started out very tiny, but were blown up by inflation until 
they were larger than the observable universe.

As a result, the value of this energy field varied from one side of the 
universe to the other at early times, enhancing the variations in 
temperature -- and matter density -- on one side of the sky relative to the 
other.

The conclusion, if correct, would shatter a cherished assumption about the 
universe. "One of the basic tenets of cosmology is that the universe is the 
same in all directions, and the standard model of inflation is built on that 
foundation," Erickcek told New Scientist. "If the asymmetry is real, then it 
tells us that one side of our universe is somehow different than the other 
side."
Few and far between

The asymmetry could theoretically be explained by the standard, single-field 
inflation scenario, though researchers say that is unlikely. That's because 
the standard theory allows for a few large-scale differences across vast 
regions of space. But these asymmetrical spots are expected to be few and 
far between, meaning that there is only a 1% chance that our observable 
universe would happen to occupy one.

Charles Bennett of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland, US, the 
chief scientist for the WMAP mission, notes that Erickcek's team has 
predicted additional subtle differences in the CMB compared to the standard 
inflation picture.

These predictions could be tested when more sensitive CMB maps are 
available. "It might be within reach of WMAP, and it will be within reach of 
Planck," he told New Scientist, referring to the European Space Agency 
satellite scheduled to launch later in 2008 to scrutinise the CMB.

Mysterious era

If further observations bear out the scenario, it would provide some 
precious new information about the universe's earliest moments, about which 
little is known. "It was a period of extremely rapid expansion, but what 
drove that expansion and how long it lasted is an open question," Erickcek 
says.

Alan Guth of MIT in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, one of the scientists who 
pioneered the inflation idea in the 1980s, says inflation is only the 
framework of a theory, with many details remaining to be filled in.

He says the team's "well thought-out" analysis is just the kind of thing 
needed to help do that. "Although the hint [from asymmetry] may very well 
turn out to be a fluke, it is only by pursuing such hints that new ideas 
will be generated, and that ultimately we will have a chance to find the 
right theory," he told New Scientist.

The asymmetry is distinct from another curious pattern in the CMB called the 
axis of evil, which some scientists have proposed is also a remnant of 
exotic physics during inflation.


 


============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to