As I continue to struggle, page by page, with Rosen, I begin to realize that much of his LINGO is category theory LINGO.
As I read Daniels and Riopella below, I wonder if much of THEIR lingo isnt category theory lingo. So, I am beginning to wonder, is it possible that Category Theory is one of those intellectual developments that has been roundly rejected by the mainstream, but whose language has crept into the mainstream to a very great degree? N Nicholas S. Thompson Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology, Clark University ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
