Perhaps so, but for the most part I think of scientists as intellectually
honest, as doing as good a job as they know how to do, and as willing to
change their minds in the face of contrary evidence.

-- Russ


On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Phil Henshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  Russ,
>
> Oh, just that scientists appear to be one of the main violators of your
> self-awareness principle.     Scientists tend to describe the physical world
> as if they are unaware that science constructs descriptive models of things
> far too complex to model, that might behave differently from any kind of
> model we know how to invent.      That has us spending a disproportionate
> amount of time looking into our theories for the behavior of the world
> around us (under the streetlight for the keys lost in the alley) and letting
> our skills in watching physical systems atrophy.
>
>
>
> Do you see the connection?    Is it partly accurate?
>
>
>
> Phil Henshaw
>
>
>
> *From:* Russ Abbott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Sent:* Monday, October 06, 2008 4:04 PM
> *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *Cc:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Self-awareness
>
>
>
> I'm sorry, Phil, I'm missing your point.  How does your comment relate to
> my argument that self-awareness is a primary good and a possible way around
> the difficulty most people have with critical thinking?
>
> -- Russ
>
> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Phil Henshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well Russ, what if a group of scientists were to acknowledge that science
> actually just seems to be descriptive after all..., and looking through the
> holes one seems able to actually see signs of a physical world after all!
>     Than sort of 'emperor's new clothes' moment might be enough to turn
> everyone's attention to value of self-critical thinking wouldn't it?!    ;-)
>
>
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Russ Abbott
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 05, 2008 10:06 PM
> *To:* The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
> *Subject:* Re: [FRIAM] Willfull Ignorance - Satisfies NickCriteria E
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 12:39 PM, glen e. p. ropella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> So the first step is for each individual to accept their responsibility
> to think/speak critically at every opportunity.  The next step is to
> package such critical thinking inside an infectious wrapper so that
> it spreads across all humanity.
>
>
> Yes, if it worked it would be wonderful. I'm  cynical enough to  doubt that
> it would succeed. (1) I doubt that we can find a wrapper infectious enough
> and (2) even if we did, I doubt that the population as a whole is capable of
> the level of critical thinking that we need. (That's elitism, isn't it.)
>
> Demagoguery almost always seems to succeed. Can anything be done about
> that? More discouraging is that advertising is cleaned up demagoguery. And
> advertising will always be with us.
>
> Just to be sure I knew what I was talking about (critical thinking?) I just
> looked up "demagoguery": "impassioned appeals to the prejudices and emotions
> of the populace."
>
> Prejudice and emotion will always be with us -- even the least prejudiced
> and least a prisoner of their emotions.  Besides, without emotion, we can't
> even make decisions. (That's clearly another discussion, but it's worth
> noting.)
>
> So can we really complain about superficial prejudice and emotion when we
> are all subject to it at some level?
>
> Perhaps the need is for self-awareness -- and even more for having a high
> regard for self-awareness -- so that one can learn about one's prejudices
> and emotions and stand back from them when appropriate.  Can we teach that?
> (It helps to have good role models. Obviously we have had exactly the
> opposite in our current president.)
>
> Actually, though, a high regard for self-awareness might be easier to teach
> than critical thinking. So perhaps there is hope. But the danger there is to
> fall prey to melodrama.  It's not easy. I'll nominate Glen as a good role
> model, though.  How can we make your persona more widely visible?
>
> -- Russ
>
>
>
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Reply via email to