glen e. p. ropella wrote:
So, the task is to further slice up the classification so that each method can be evaluated in the context of a domain as, say, "very useful in that domain", "useful", "not very useful". (If you don't like the categories (1-3) above, then come up with some others. You can also replace "useful" with "common".) I suspect when/if we got to a classification granularity of 5-9 (possibly falsely) distinct methods, we can begin to assert where each method is _most_ useful.
Then make a pretty area-proportional Euler diagram out of the result.. :-)
http://www.informatik.uni-ulm.de/ni/staff/HKestler/vennm/doc.html ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
