Here are some hockey references from friend of mine who is a warming
skeptic. I guess I m worse then these guys as a remain skeptical of
the skeptics.
Chip Garner
[email protected]
This one is not peer reviewed but is a very good explanation, sort of
a must read prep for the peer reviewed ones that follow:
· http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/APEC-hockey.pdf
(this ones a little old and does not include many new findings. Still,
it's very good, and is well referenced)
· http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2008/8/11/caspar-and-the-jesus-paper.html
(this one a pretty good history of the HS controversy, even though
it's a blog)
Peer reviewed. Be aware that most of these only address a narrow
aspect of the hockey stick, or it’s implications, so you have to read
these and more to get the whole picture:
· http://www.climateaudit.org/pdf/mcintyre.mckitrick.2003.pdf
· http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/M&M.EE2005.pdf
· http://www.ecd.bnl.gov/steve/pubs/HeatCapacity.pdf
· http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/08/070801175711.htm
(this is an abstract of the peer reviewed paper which I don't have
access to. See the note at the bottom for the actual reference)
· http://www.griffith.edu.au/conference/ics2007/pdf/ICS176.pdf
·
http://www.spacecenter.dk/publications/scientific-report-series/Scient_No._3.pdf
I’m these are peer reviewed or are summaries of peer reviewed
articles, but I’m not certain:
· http://www.climateaudit.org/pdf/mcintyre.grl.2005.pdf
· http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-09/uosc-cdd092507.php#
(another that abstracts a peer reviewed article)
· http://www.uah.edu/News/newsread.php?newsID=875 (another
"abstract". Reference is in the text-body.)
· http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070315101129.htm
(another "abstract". Reference is at the bottom.)
Jan 24, 2009, at 10:00 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Send Friam mailing list submissions to
[email protected]
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[email protected]
You can reach the person managing the list at
[email protected]
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Friam digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Mann's hockey stick (glen e. p. ropella)
From: "glen e. p. ropella" <[email protected]>
Date: January 23, 2009 4:04:27 PM MST
To: "fr...@redfish. com" <[email protected]>
Subject: [FRIAM] Mann's hockey stick
Reply-To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <[email protected]
>
Hey guys,
I have a friend who claims Mann's hockey stick data was demonstrated
as
erroneous in a peer-reviewed journal. All I've found searching the
net
are criticisms from non-peer-reviewed sources.
Note, I don't care whether the original hockey stick was flawed,
whether
the earth is warming, and/or why, etc.. I'm just looking to see if
the
criticisms of Mann's paper were published in a credible journal.
Perhaps they are embedded in the subsequent papers showing different
manifestations of the hockey stick, thereby both confirming the
conclusion and contradicting the methods?
--
glen e. p. ropella, 971-222-9095, http://agent-based-modeling.com
_______________________________________________
Friam mailing list
[email protected]
http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
