If homeostasis is the problem, this would seem to increase
conservativism. Reviewers would not want their names attached to
papers that might turn out to be wrong (perhaps embarrassingly so.)
On Jan 28, 2009, at 11:25 AM, Peter Lissaman wrote:
The idea is that a published paper should be preceded by the names
of the
reviewers for and agin said work. That terrifies the profs! Still
throws
no light on the naysayers if a paper is rejected!
Peter Lissaman, Da Vinci Ventures
Expertise is not knowing everything, but knowing what to look for.
1454 Miracerros Loop South, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505
TEL: (505) 983-7728 FAX: (505) 983-1694
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
Michael T. Nygard
[email protected]
http://www.michaelnygard.com/
Release It! Design and Deploy Production-Ready Software
http://bit.ly/ReleaseIt
Beautiful Architecture
http://bit.ly/BeautifulArchitecture
============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org
